22 Responses for "10-year-olds’ constitutional right to wear mini-skirts"

1. Random April 8th, 2006 at 5:53 1

   Sadly she doesnt know the eyes of loli teachers are ever watchful. Which bring up the fact perhaps the teachers themselves are recovering Loliers, and the mini skirts dont help in their recovery.

   Kind’ve reminds me of Azumanga Daioh and that creepy teacher.

2. AnonymousBlogger April 8th, 2006 at 6:47 2

   While I definitely prefer cute dresses (and longer skirts) I don’t think that outfit she has on looks bad at all. The skirt’s not that short really, I’ve seen much worse (on girls her age even). I think the principal’s being a little over zealous.

   I wonder if her sign’s actually more readible in person though. It looks like the other letters have glitter on them and the flash probably washed them out badly. Still not the smartest choice but she’s 10 and planning a protest about not being able to wear short skirts to school so she’s not exactly an A+ student in Common Sense.

   Damn cute though, I say let her wear whatever (or as little as) she wants! I doubt any of her male classmates mind and probably most of the male teachers don’t either.

3. Chris April 8th, 2006 at 7:32 3

   That’s a pretty tough provocation. I’m looking forward to photoshopped version with an improved textual message. xrsin? is that r0r1 speak for extreme sin or something?

4. Ersatz Datura April 8th, 2006 at 8:54 4

   I love the constitution and all, but this sort of stuff doesn’t really make sense. It’s not like she got suspended for wearing a political shirt or something. What, exactly, are her legs expressing?

   That said, the outfit, frankly, looks fine to me. I can’t even say it’s particularly whorish. She looks like every other teenage girl (yeah, she’s 10 but 10 year olds desperately want to be teens).

5. Chris April 8th, 2006 at 9:30 5

   Look closely. She looks almost exactly like Haruka from Noein in that outfit. Do you really want to risk damage to the time-space continuum? Do you want some weird white-haired bum running around her mumbling “I’ll protect Zoe!1″, huh?

6. wastrel April 8th, 2006 at 20:25 6

   I enjoy seeing loli legs as much as the next guy, but do the girls have to dress up like whores?

   They don’t have to, but it’s fun when they do once in a while.

   I must also say that nudism is a lifestyle choice, and hence part of freedom of expression. If they hold a nudism rally, please let me know. Please.

7. wastrel April 8th, 2006 at 22:20 7

   *sigh* The above comment shows why you shouldn’t leave the lolitron site up on your computer when friends come over, and then leave the room for a few mintues.

   I need friends with better senses of humor, I do.

8. AnonymousBlogger April 8th, 2006 at 22:46 8

   It doesn’t have anything to do with the constitution, it’s freedom of speech, not expression, but I guess you could argue how you dress is a form of speech. I think she just feels it’s unfair and is protesting it because of that. At least she’s being proactive and polite about it, better than a lot of her detractors are apparently.

   Hehe, what’s wrong with the thought of a loli nudism rally? I don’t think you need a sense of humor to appreciate that, a sense of horniness perhaps but not humor.

9. Natasha April 9th, 2006 at 2:32 9

   Simply put, ten year old girls should not wear mini skirts. I’m 19, in my day (oh god, i sound 60) but i never wore a short mini skirt to school. For god sakes people, she hasn’t even developed tits, that’s why she’s holding a sign to her chest. Her male classmates haven’t reached puberty yet, they still have to wait till around 13-14 before they start jerking off. So at her age the boys in her class are thinking, “wow, why is she showing so much skin. She must be cold. Hey Jamal, want to go play basketball, a dollar says i can take you?” And her teacher sees her and thinking, “Well that’s going to be the next structual engineer right there!” then they go in the teacher lounge talk about the girls parents and say “her parents don’t care, it’s disgusting. hell, in my day girls covered up, it left something to the imagination. Hell, if my wife put that much out, i’d be a happy man.” so in reality, think about it, if you can subtract 5 years from the girls age for this tramp, i mean this girl (i blame the parents..) five years ago might of been a late kid to get off the pacifier. So, to this girl i say, wear some pants, or longer skirts. If you feel the urge to strip, go to a nudest beach with several 60 year olds starring at you, that should surpress your feeling of stripping in public for several years to come. Or, it may promote your future aspiration to later becoming a full fledged hooker. Right on little buddy right on. *thumbs up* promote HIV and all other sexual transmitted dieases, because hookers keep help hold back our species from reaching our carrying capacity. To all those people who disagree i say, i’ll make you pretty with a two-by-four. This is tasha, signing off.

10. Shish April 9th, 2006 at 15:30 10

    Here in England we’re pretty much all forced into non-sexy uniforms until 18~ Mostly it works, but some of our 10 year olds are *really* desperate to look whorish, and the overall result is terribly ugly :-/

11. AnonymousBlogger April 10th, 2006 at 1:48 11

    Sounds a lot like what happens in Japan, the girls will roll up the skirts to make them insanely short and the result is pretty awful. They’re cuter with skirts longer than 4 inches.

12. Saria April 11th, 2006 at 5:29 12

    I think 10 year olds in mini skirts and Britney Spears whore fashion defeat the true concept of pure lolipedo innocence. It is disgusting how people at any age can look like a whore, let alone a little girl. I hate seeing 5 year olds in tube tops. I can’t believe parents would dress their children that way.

    That said, no one do a Google search for “loli Saria whore fashion”… You’ll find nothing, I tell you, nothing!

13. Rainy April 11th, 2006 at 7:36 13

    Her skirt is really too short and risqué for a girl her age. But then again, she hardly looks like an innocent 10-year-old.

14. abq April 12th, 2006 at 0:37 14

    I dunno, Saria’s skirt (or tunica) looks quite short if you ask me

    

15. Streicher April 13th, 2006 at 8:26 15

    There is no sense in her wearing something sexy like this. She and her classmates won’t hit puberty for years. Generally I like miniskirts but this is like wearing a full plate armor. There just is no reasoning behind it.

16. yummeh.. April 13th, 2006 at 13:22 16

    i say let her wear what she wants! … yum… :d …

17. Chris April 13th, 2006 at 15:23 17

    Huh? You hit puberty when you’re 11-13 but for girls it’s usually 1-2 before boys. And kids certainly know sooner about sex nowadays because there’s so much about it in the media. Maybe there should be a poll “When did you first masturbate yourself?”. Although as far as I heard, even though girls hit the puberty first, it takes much longer before they masturbate.

18. tokochan April 15th, 2006 at 18:53 18

    that is true I had my first umm…experience when I was 11 with a girl her age and they know more about sex then you think way more.

19. lolilover July 11th, 2006 at 17:36 19

    Boy, this girl is cute! I’d also let her wear anything she wanted. To begin with, I don’t know what the hell is wrong with her miniskirt. If she weared a long one, a blow of wind could let anyone see her panties. Would that be better?

20. Madman July 12th, 2006 at 16:13 20

    yes, i love this loli! the short mini looks great on her but, personally i would like to see her wearing nothing at all, preferably in my bedroom…

21. Kenn1911 July 31st, 2006 at 10:03 21

    Damn she’s hot
    great loli legs she has

22. Project A May 31st, 2008 at 8:52 22

    I love that Loli-Logic !!!!