<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Revised and hopefully final draft</title>
	<link>http://www.lolitron.org/2007/01/08/revised-and-hopefully-final-draft/</link>
	<description>not just another anime blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hontou ni Taihen desu &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Loli - A personal definition</title>
		<link>http://www.lolitron.org/2007/01/08/revised-and-hopefully-final-draft/#comment-103112</link>
		<dc:creator>Hontou ni Taihen desu &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Loli - A personal definition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 19:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lolitron.org/2007/01/08/revised-and-hopefully-final-draft/#comment-103112</guid>
		<description>[...] For those following Sai-loli would know that there are some skimishes in loli-land on the validity of candidature of several nominations. Yuzuhara Konomi was one such figure of contention. Several believe she fails the loli-test because of age and cup-size, while others maintained inner loli-characteristics are sufficient attributes for laying claim to the title. The issue, I believe, lies in the usage of a pseudo-English word in a Japanese context. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] For those following Sai-loli would know that there are some skimishes in loli-land on the validity of candidature of several nominations. Yuzuhara Konomi was one such figure of contention. Several believe she fails the loli-test because of age and cup-size, while others maintained inner loli-characteristics are sufficient attributes for laying claim to the title. The issue, I believe, lies in the usage of a pseudo-English word in a Japanese context. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zield</title>
		<link>http://www.lolitron.org/2007/01/08/revised-and-hopefully-final-draft/#comment-102275</link>
		<dc:creator>zield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lolitron.org/2007/01/08/revised-and-hopefully-final-draft/#comment-102275</guid>
		<description>why there's no bincho-tan?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why there&#8217;s no bincho-tan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ペインサマ</title>
		<link>http://www.lolitron.org/2007/01/08/revised-and-hopefully-final-draft/#comment-101897</link>
		<dc:creator>ペインサマ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lolitron.org/2007/01/08/revised-and-hopefully-final-draft/#comment-101897</guid>
		<description>Konomi
&#62;&#62;It all depends of the artist. In the H-game she’s definitly not loli if you look at the HCGs. It’s true however that some artist make her loli, but it’s also the case the other way around.
Someone put on boobs on her? I'd burn them in hell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Konomi<br />
&gt;&gt;It all depends of the artist. In the H-game she’s definitly not loli if you look at the HCGs. It’s true however that some artist make her loli, but it’s also the case the other way around.<br />
Someone put on boobs on her? I&#8217;d burn them in hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firebird</title>
		<link>http://www.lolitron.org/2007/01/08/revised-and-hopefully-final-draft/#comment-101652</link>
		<dc:creator>Firebird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lolitron.org/2007/01/08/revised-and-hopefully-final-draft/#comment-101652</guid>
		<description>in this case.... konomi is not considered loli because she had quite a big breast? 

iLOL'd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in this case&#8230;. konomi is not considered loli because she had quite a big breast? </p>
<p>iLOL&#8217;d.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lolitron.org/2007/01/08/revised-and-hopefully-final-draft/#comment-101586</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lolitron.org/2007/01/08/revised-and-hopefully-final-draft/#comment-101586</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&#62;&#62;She is. I nominated for her too. You may argue that the age is the problem with her, but my points for Konomi would be the same as Hagu in Hachikuro, and Rizelmine, age is not a problem sometimes, it is the chara itself.&lt;/i&gt;
It all depends of the artist. In the H-game she's definitly not loli if you look at the HCGs.
It's true however that some artist make her loli, but it's also the case the other way around.
It doesn't matter anymore though as she lost to Etna.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&gt;&gt;She is. I nominated for her too. You may argue that the age is the problem with her, but my points for Konomi would be the same as Hagu in Hachikuro, and Rizelmine, age is not a problem sometimes, it is the chara itself.</i><br />
It all depends of the artist. In the H-game she&#8217;s definitly not loli if you look at the HCGs.<br />
It&#8217;s true however that some artist make her loli, but it&#8217;s also the case the other way around.<br />
It doesn&#8217;t matter anymore though as she lost to Etna.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abq</title>
		<link>http://www.lolitron.org/2007/01/08/revised-and-hopefully-final-draft/#comment-101224</link>
		<dc:creator>abq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 23:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lolitron.org/2007/01/08/revised-and-hopefully-final-draft/#comment-101224</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;abq, to get a wider audience, you need to expand your loli FAQ I think.

Care to elaborate? The concept if pretty straightforward if you ask me. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to understand how it works.

To get a wider audience I have to:

1) Promote this project.
2) Omit the word loli.

I'll do neither. I don't like promoting my own site. If other bloggers want to make a post about this, that is fine. If anonymous wants to tell his mom, he can. I just don't want to be the one doing the shameless plugging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>>abq, to get a wider audience, you need to expand your loli FAQ I think.</p>
<p>Care to elaborate? The concept if pretty straightforward if you ask me. You don&#8217;t need to be a rocket scientist to understand how it works.</p>
<p>To get a wider audience I have to:</p>
<p>1) Promote this project.<br />
2) Omit the word loli.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll do neither. I don&#8217;t like promoting my own site. If other bloggers want to make a post about this, that is fine. If anonymous wants to tell his mom, he can. I just don&#8217;t want to be the one doing the shameless plugging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heavens lolipop</title>
		<link>http://www.lolitron.org/2007/01/08/revised-and-hopefully-final-draft/#comment-101220</link>
		<dc:creator>heavens lolipop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 22:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lolitron.org/2007/01/08/revised-and-hopefully-final-draft/#comment-101220</guid>
		<description>Lol...ya'll argue waaaay too much about the "authentic loli". there's so much diversity in opinion on the subject as the huge spectrum it is, so of course there's going to be conflicting opinions. maybe or maybe not or your favorite character got nominated, but for now let's just let things go as they will according to the standards abq has set. either you choose to take part or not, it isn't really up to us the specifics of the whole thing. so relax</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol&#8230;ya&#8217;ll argue waaaay too much about the &#8220;authentic loli&#8221;. there&#8217;s so much diversity in opinion on the subject as the huge spectrum it is, so of course there&#8217;s going to be conflicting opinions. maybe or maybe not or your favorite character got nominated, but for now let&#8217;s just let things go as they will according to the standards abq has set. either you choose to take part or not, it isn&#8217;t really up to us the specifics of the whole thing. so relax</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Stein</title>
		<link>http://www.lolitron.org/2007/01/08/revised-and-hopefully-final-draft/#comment-101209</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Stein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lolitron.org/2007/01/08/revised-and-hopefully-final-draft/#comment-101209</guid>
		<description>Vita vs Becky?
Hayate vs Choco?

This is already looking very tough for me. Nice choices though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vita vs Becky?<br />
Hayate vs Choco?</p>
<p>This is already looking very tough for me. Nice choices though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beowulf Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.lolitron.org/2007/01/08/revised-and-hopefully-final-draft/#comment-101208</link>
		<dc:creator>Beowulf Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lolitron.org/2007/01/08/revised-and-hopefully-final-draft/#comment-101208</guid>
		<description>abq, to get a wider audience, you need to expand your loli FAQ I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>abq, to get a wider audience, you need to expand your loli FAQ I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lolitron.org/2007/01/08/revised-and-hopefully-final-draft/#comment-101181</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lolitron.org/2007/01/08/revised-and-hopefully-final-draft/#comment-101181</guid>
		<description>methinks anonymous doth protest too much
keep up the good work abq</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>methinks anonymous doth protest too much<br />
keep up the good work abq</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.477 seconds -->
